Then, he gets into the poaching in a more detailed way, explaining that the point isn't just to apply the results of sciences to the humanities (19). No, the point is to take a concept and the baggage that comes with it (like its connection to other concepts) and create a new system of concepts (20). Massumi reminds me that I can't just take a single, isolated concept from another field and apply it--it comes with baggage and connections to other concepts. Then, Massumi writes:
The optimal situation would be to take a scientific concept and use it in such a way that it ceases to be systematically scientific but doesn't end up tamed, a metaphorical exhibit in someone else's menagerie....A concept is by nature connectble to other concepts. A concept is defined less by its semantic content than by the regularities of connection that have been established between it and other concepts....When you uproot a concept from its network of systemic connections with other concepts, you still have its connectibility. (20)I think I want to do this for my final project. The concept will likely come from Institutional Psychology, and I'll bring it, along with its connections, into Rhet/Comp to find ways to improve labor conditions in our field. As Massumi writes, "The point is to borrow from science in order to make a difference in the humanities" (21). This is really what I want to do--make a difference in the humanities!
So, here's my current draft-y question to work on this semester:
What can institutional psychology offer to help change labor conditions in the field of Rhetoric and Composition?
Yes, still broad, but it's getting somewhere! I need to do some reading on Institutional Psychology. Does anyone have a suggestion for where to start?
No comments:
Post a Comment